Original Article
Brief psychological intervention in phase I of cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome
Intervenção psicológica na fase I da reabilitação cardíaca pós-síndroma coronária aguda
Ana Cláudia Fernandesa, Teresa McIntyreb, Rui Coelhoc,d, Joana Pratac,d,, , Maria Júlia Maciele
a Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Sociais, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Braga, Portugal
b School of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Houston Baptist University, USA
c Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
d Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
e Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Received 16 November 2016, Accepted 28 January 2017
Abstract
Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an important cause of mortality and significant personal and financial costs. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have shown positive effects in reducing cardiovascular mortality and improving functional capacity. However, adherence is low and appears to be influenced by psychosocial factors, such as patients’ cognitions and emotional state. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a brief in-hospital psychological intervention to promote cognitive and emotional adaptation after ACS.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-one patients with ACS, admitted to a coronary care unit in a central hospital, were randomized to an experimental group (EG, n=65) and a control group (CG, n=56). Portuguese versions of the HADS and BIPQ were used to measure emotional well-being and illness cognitions. Two 1 h 15 min sessions were conducted 2-3 days after hospital admission, and a 20-minute follow-up session took place one month after discharge. Patients were assessed at four different time points: pre-test, post-test, and at 1- and 2-month follow-up.

Results

The intervention had significant effects on anxiety, depression and illness cognitions. Anxiety and depression were significantly reduced and illness cognitions improved significantly in the EG compared to the control group. For the EG, these changes were maintained or enhanced at 1- and 2-month follow-up, whereas for the CG there was a deterioration in psychosocial adjustment.

Conclusions

These results indicate that a brief psychological intervention program delivered during hospitalization for ACS and combined with standard medical care can have positive effects in terms of psychosocial outcomes that have proven impact on cardiac rehabilitation and prognosis.

Resumo
Introdução

A síndroma coronária aguda (SCA) é uma importante causa de mortalidade, com custos pessoais e financeiros consideráveis. Os programas de reabilitação cardíaca têm benefícios na redução da mortalidade e melhoria da capacidade funcional. Contudo, a adesão é baixa e depende de fatores como o estado emocional e as representações de doença. Neste trabalho, avaliou-se a eficácia de um programa de intervenção psicológica breve na fase I da reabilitação cardíaca da SCA.

Material e métodos

Cento e vinte e um doentes com SCA, admitidos na unidade coronária de um hospital central, foram aleatorizados num grupo experimental (GE) (n= 65) e num grupo de controlo (GC) (n=56). Foram utilizadas versões portuguesas da HADS e IPQ-B para avaliar a adaptação emocional e as representações de doença. Foram efetuadas duas sessões de 1 h15 min, 2-3 dias após a admissão hospitalar, e uma avaliação de follow-up um mês após a alta hospitalar de 20 min. Os doentes foram avaliados em quatro momentos: pré-teste, pós-teste, um e dois meses follow-up.

Resultados

Os resultados demonstraram um efeito positivo e significativo da intervenção. A ansiedade e depressão evidenciaram uma redução significativa e as representações de doença melhoraram significativamente no GE, comparativamente ao GC. No GE estas alterações mantiveram-se ou aumentaram no follow-up de um e dois meses, enquanto no GC houve uma deterioração no ajustamento psicológico.

Conclusões

A intervenção psicológica breve durante a hospitalização por SCA, aliada ao tratamento médico convencional, pode ter efeitos positivos em termos de adaptação psicossocial, cujo impacto está amplamente demonstrado na reabilitação cardíaca e no prognóstico clínico.

Keywords
Acute coronary syndrome, Hospital-based psychosocial intervention, Cardiac rehabilitation, Anxiety, Depression, Illness cognitions
Palavras-chave
Síndroma coronária aguda, Intervenção psicológica breve, Reabilitação cardíaca, Ansiedade, Depressão, Representações de doença
Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is an important cause of mortality in developed countries and is responsible for a large number of hospital admissions, as well as for significant personal and financial costs.1 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs reduce cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality and non-fatal ACS and facilitate physical and psychological recovery following acute events.2–5 Furthermore, CR significantly reduces the associated burden on healthcare by maximizing physical, psychological and social functioning and promoting behaviors that reduce or prevent the recurrence of acute events.5,6 Despite the plentiful evidence supporting the effectiveness of CR, studies show that there is low adherence to these programs,7–9 with participation rates varying from 21 to 75%.6,10,11 Two surveys in European countries concluded that less than half of eligible patients participate in CR programs in most countries.10,11

The negative impact of ACS on patients’ psychological functioning has been linked to a lower adherence to therapy and consequently to greater cardiac vulnerability, constituting a higher risk for the recurrence of an acute event.12,13 Multidisciplinary programs that include a psychological component appear to be highly effective and have shown significant benefits in post-ACS morbidity and mortality.14–16 Various clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of such programs have supported the provision of biopsychosocial care in hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation.17,18

In Portugal, research in this area is still scarce and clinical trials on psychological intervention in CR are practically non-existent. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a brief multidisciplinary psycho-educational intervention in hospitalized ACS patients targeting various psychosocial and behavioral outcomes.

MethodsParticipants and design

The sample consisted of 121 patients (36 females and 84 males), diagnosed with ACS and admitted to the coronary care unit of a central hospital in Portugal. Mean age was 63.78 years (standard deviation 12.48) and 48% of the sample had six or more years of education. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study, which was approved by the ethics committee.

Patients were randomized to an experimental group (EG, n=65) and a control group (CG, n=56), at the time of admission to the coronary care unit, using consecutive weekly randomization (e.g. week 1 for EG and week 2 for CG). Patients were assessed at four time points: hospital admission – pre-test (T1), hospital discharge – post-test (T2), 1-month follow-up (T3) and 2-month follow-up (T4).

Patients in the EG underwent an intervention within 2-3 days of hospital admission, consisting of two sessions (1 hr 15 min each) and a follow-up session (20 min) at one month after hospital discharge (Table 1). The intervention modality was in group format (mean of six participants per group) and included: (a) health education about ACS and cardiac rehabilitation (session 1) and (b) promotion of psychosocial adjustment in post-ACS rehabilitation (session 2). During the first session information regarding ACS and CR was presented, and patients produced individual contracts regarding the CR program and were encouraged to share information with family members. They were also referred to a specialist in changing risk behaviors. The second session, which took place before hospital discharge, focused on the emotional response to ACS and the importance of illness cognitions in adjustment and adaptive coping. Patients were taught cognitive-behavioral strategies to reduce stress and anxiety, how to identify erroneous beliefs and change them into adaptive ones, and self-monitoring; family involvement was once more encouraged. Session 3 was a follow-up session one month post-discharge and focused on reviewing previous commitments, identifying successes and challenges, promoting goal reformulation and discussing future implementation strategies.

Table 1.

Structure of the brief psychosocial intervention program in post-acute coronary syndrome rehabilitation.

Session/theme  Objectives  Providers  Time  Context 
Session 1
Education on ACS and cardiac rehabilitation 
- To convey information about ACS and its consequences and risk factors and about CR;
- to produce individual contracts regarding CR;
- to refer to specialists in changing risk behaviors;
- to encourage information-sharing with immediate family 
Psychologist
Cardiologist 
1 hr 15 min  Hospital admission (contact prior to 3rd day) 
Session 2
Promotion of psychosocial adjustment in post-ACS rehabilitation 
- to convey information about emotional responses to ACS and to provide brief training in cognitive-behavioral strategies to reduce stress and anxiety associated with ACS;
- to educate on the role of illness cognitions in adjustment to ACS;
- to teach identification of erroneous beliefs and train in changing to adaptive beliefs;
- to promote adaptive coping;
- to plan self-monitoring;
- to encourage family involvement in coping post-discharge 
Psychologist  1 hr 15 min  Hospitalization
(before hospital discharge) 
Session 3
Follow-up after hospital discharge 
- to review commitments made in previous sessions;
- to promote identification of successes and challenges;
- to promote goal reformulation;
- to discuss future implementation strategies 
Psychologist  20 min  1 month post-discharge 

ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CR: cardiac rehabilitation.

The following two hypotheses were tested: (1) we expected that the EG (psychosocial intervention) would present significantly better outcomes at post-test than the CG in terms of anxiety, depression and illness cognitions; (2) we also expected that these gains would be maintained over 1- and 2-month follow-up.

Instruments

The instruments used were the Portuguese versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ). The Portuguese version of the HADS,19 which has similar psychometric properties to the original scale, consists of two subscales measuring levels of anxiety and depression. The Portuguese version of the BIPQ,20 which has similar psychometric properties to the original scale, consists of nine items that assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness: consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity, concern, and emotions, plus one assessing comprehensibility and an open question about the three most important causes of their illness.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 19.0. Univariate and multivariate repeated measures statistical procedures were used to test hypotheses. Age and pre-test values of the outcome variables were entered as covariates. Equivalence of the experimental and control groups at pre-test in terms of demographic and psychosocial variables was established using group comparison statistics (the chi-square test for nominal variables and the t test for continuous variables).

Results

Tables 2 and 3 present the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample. The groups were equivalent in most sociodemographic variables and all clinical variables, with only a marginally significant difference found for age, the CG being slightly older (66.1±12.6 vs. 61.8±12.1 years).

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study sample and comparison by group.

Sociodemographic variables  EG (n=65)CG (n=56)chi-square/t 
     
Gender0.102  0.749 
Female  20  31.3  16  28.6     
Male  44  68.8  40  71.4     
Marital status1.020  0.600 
Married  50  78.1  45  80.4     
Widow(er)  14.1  16.1     
Other  7.8  3.6     
Education3.785  0.286 
<4 years  13  20  12  21.4     
4 years  23  35.4  27  48.2     
4-12 years  18  27.7  13  23.2     
>12 years  11  16.9  7.1     
Employment status2.266  0.322 
Employed  23  35.4  13  23.2     
Retired  36  55.4  38  67.9     
Other  9.2  8.9     
Family status1.855  0.603 
Single  10.8  7.1     
Married  21  32.3  23  41.1     
Married with children  31  47.7  22  39.3     
Other             
  SD  SD  chi-square/t 
Age  61.77  12.11  66.11  12.61  -1.927  0.056 

CG: control group; EG: experimental group; M: mean; SD: standard deviation.

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics of the study sample and comparison by group.

  EG (n=65)CG (n=56)chi-square/t 
     
Risk factors
Family history of CHD  9.8  12.7  -0.243  0.622 
Hypertension  38  62.3  27  49.1  2.047  0.153 
Diabetes  19  31.1  14  25.5  0.416  0.497 
Dyslipidemia  37  60.7  30  54.5  1.508  0.470 
Smoking  33  54.1  31  56.4  0.060  0.806 
Alcohol consumption  4.9  5.5  0.017  0.896 
Obesity  12  19.7  9.1  2.589  0.108 
Personal history of CHD  21  34.4  21  38.2  0.190  0.909 
Clinical variables
Mean time to healthcare after symptom onset          0.240  0.887 
<2 hours  19  31.7  17  31.5     
2-12 hours  20  33.3  16  29.6     
>12 hours  21  35  21  38.9     
Admission ECG          0.256  0.880 
ST elevation  19  43.2  12  37.5     
No ST elevation  21  47.7  17  53.1     
LBBB  9.1  9.4     
Invasive procedures1.312  0.519 
PCI  28  46.7  23  41.8     
Coronary surgery  15  25  11  20     
LV function2.449  0.294 
Normal  27  46.6  33  60     
Mild/moderate dysfunction  17  29.3  14  25.5     
Severe dysfunction  14  24.1  14.5     
Diagnosis0.935  0.333 
MI  47  77  38  69.1     
Unstable angina  14  23  17  30.9     

CG: control group; CHD: coronary heart disease; ECG: electrocardiogram; EG: experimental group; LBBB: left bundle branch block; LV: left ventricular; MI: myocardial infarction; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.

The EG and CG differed at pre-test in most of the psychosocial outcomes (Table 4), although these pre-test differences were controlled for in testing the hypotheses. The CG had lower levels of anxiety (9.34±4.03 vs. 12.45±3.73) and depression (9.61±4.49 vs. 12.80±4.05). Regarding illness cognitions at pre-test, the EG had more negative perceptions of their illness for the personal control, identity, comprehensibility and emotions sub-scales of the BIPQ.

Table 4.

Results of covariance analyses for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire scores at pre-test, with group as factor, controlling for age (n=121).

  EG (n=65)CG (n=56)
  SD  SD     
HADS
Anxiety  12.45  3.73  9.34  4.03  17.930  <0.001 
Depression  12.80  4.05  9.61  4.49  18.736  <0.001 
Total HADS  25.25  6.708  18.95  7.154  25.180  <0.001 
BIPQ
Consequences  3.14  0.85  2.84  1.16  2.846  0.094 
Timeline  2.65  0.99  2.34  1.13  3.527  0.063 
Personal control  1.20  0.89  1.71  1.12  9.015  0.003 
Treatment control  2.95  0.82  3.20  .67  3.255  0.074 
Identity  2.80  0.64  2.00  1.09  26.167  <0.001 
Concern  3.31  0.86  2.93  1.22  3.488  0.064 
Comprehensibility  1.28  0.89  2.09  1.01  22.987  <0.001 
Emotions  3.02  0.93  2.29  1.37  13.069  <0.001 

BIPQ: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire; CG: control group; EG: experimental group; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; M: mean; SD: standard deviation.

Hypothesis 1: post-test effectsEmotional state

Table 5 shows that the CG presented significantly higher (p<0.001) levels of anxiety and depression at post-test than the EG. The same can be observed for the total HADS score, which was significantly higher than in the EG (p<0.001).

Table 5.

Results of covariance analyses and multivariate covariance analyses for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire scores at post-test, with group as factor, controlling for age and pre-test subscale values (n=121).

  EG (n=65)CG (n=56)
  SE  SE     
HADS151.89  <0.001 
Anxiety  5.20  0.30  12.45  0.32     
Depression  5.16  0.35  12.94  0.38     
Total HADS  10.36  0.55  25.39  0.60  302.460  <0.001 
BIPQ
Consequences  2.09  0.08  3.27  0.08  81.58  <0.001 
Timeline  2.19  0.09  2.98  0.09  30.32  <0.001 
Personal control  2.42  0.08  1.22  0.09  71.00  <0.001 
Treatment control  3.12  0.07  2.96  0.08  1.94  0.167 
Identity  0.68  0.09  1.73  0.09  52.74  <0.001 
Concern  1.99  0.07  3.39  0.08  134.31  <0.001 
Comprehensibility  2.55  0.08  1.29  0.09  95.71  <0.001 
Emotions  1.92  0.09  3.14  0.09  73.36  <0.001 

BIPQ: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire; CG: control group; EG: experimental group; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; M: mean; SE: standard error.

Illness representations

The EG presented significant improvements (all p<0.001) at post-test in illness representations in terms of their perception of illness consequences, timeline, experience of symptoms (identity), concern, emotions, personal control and comprehensibility, whereas the CG presented a less adaptive cognitive profile (Table 5).

Hypothesis 2: time changes by groupEmotional state

Table 6 presents the results for time/group interaction effects (covariance analyses and repeated measures multivariate covariance analyses) for post-test through the 2-month follow-up changes by group. The EG presented a linear tendency to decrease in terms of anxiety and depression over time, whereas the CG maintained higher anxiety and increased depression with time, especially at two months after hospital discharge. A similar pattern can be observed for the total HADS scores, with a decrease over time in emotional distress for the EG and no change or increase with time in the CG, especially at 2-month follow-up.

Table 6.

Results of repeated measures multivariate covariance analyses for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire subscale scores, using time and group as factors and controlling for the effects of age and pre-test subscale scores (n=121).

Time point  T2T3T4
  SE  SE  SE     
BIPQ
Time/group                 
Consequences23.233  <0.001 
EG  2.077  0.072  1.978  0.080  1.892  0.060     
CG  3.286  0.078  3.043  0.087  3.643  0.065     
Timeline20.259  <0.001 
EG  2.200  0.082  2.033  0.083  1.937  0.070     
CG  2.967  0.087  2.927  0.089  3.429  0.075     
Personal control22.431  <0.001 
EG  2.463  0.083  2.546  0.093  2.860  0.094     
CG  1.170  0.090  1.238  0.101  0.617  0.102     
Treatment control16.017  <0.001 
EG  3.118  0.067  3.068  0.066  3.148  0.107     
CG  2.952  0.073  2.939  0.072  2.221  0.116     
Identity13.861  <0.001 
EG  0.643  0.088  0.737  0.090  0.399  0.092     
CG  1.772  0.095  1.091  0.097  0.912  0.100     
Concern9.327  <0.001 
EG  1.991  0.069  1.933  0.083  1.757  0.085     
CG  3.385  0.074  3.149  0.090  3.550  0.091     
Comprehensibility33.599  <0.001 
EG  2.574  0.075  2.606  0.091  3.394  0.100     
CG  1.273  0.081  1.397  0.098  0.728  0.107     
Emotions14.887  <0.001 
EG  1.935  0.082  1.863  0.096  1.493  0.093     
CG  3.129  0.089  3.124  0.104  3.499  0.101     
HADS
Time/group                 
Anxiety14.120  <0.001 
EG  5.234  0.291  4.546  0.332  2.847  0.339     
CG  12.407  0.316  11.420  0.360  12.017  0.367     
Depression64.403  <0.001 
EG  5.134  0.344  4.843  0.397  2.623  0.374     
CG  12.969  0.374  13.307  0.431  16.134  0.406     
HADS total44.988  <0.001 
EG  10.357  0.555  9.405  0.676  5.520  0.635     
CG  25.390  0.603  24.708  0.734  28.092  0.690     

BIPQ: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire; CG: control group; EG: experimental group; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; M: mean; SE: standard error; T2: post-test; T3: 1-month follow-up; T4: 2-month follow-up.

Illness cognitions

In relation to illness representations, significant time/group interaction effects were observed for all dimensions (all p<0.001, Table 6). Overall, there were more positive illness cognitions in the EG than in the CG, and this advantage was maintained over time. More specifically, patients in the EG perceived less negative consequences of their illness than in the CG, and this perception tended to decrease over time, whereas the CG showed increased perception of negative consequences of their illness after discharge. A similar pattern can be seen in terms of timeline, concern and emotions, indicating an advantage for the EG over time. Identity perception tended to decrease with time in both groups, although the CG reported more symptoms associated with their illness than the EG. The perception of personal control, treatment control and comprehensibility increased over time in the EG, whereas these dimensions tended to decrease in the CG, especially at 2-month follow-up.

Discussion

This study aimed to test the efficacy of a brief in-hospital psychosocial intervention directed at improving emotional and cognitive outcomes for patients with ACS. The results demonstrate significant benefits for the EG in terms of less anxiety and depression and more positive illness representations after the intervention, in comparison to the CG, who received standard medical care. These results are even more significant given the fact that the EG had a less favorable psychosocial profile at pre-test than the CG. These results were independent of patients’ age and baseline scores on the psychosocial variables studied. The advantages of the intervention for the EG were particularly noticeable at two months post-discharge, suggesting that the effects of the intervention lasted into the rehabilitation period, counteracting the psychosocial deterioration that was observed in the CG.

The positive impact of this intervention in terms of depressive symptoms is important bearing in mind the predictive effect of depression on cardiovascular mortality after ACS.21,22 The intervention program sought to prevent the increase in both anxiety and depression associated with post-ACS rehabilitation, not only by promoting education about ACS and its treatment but also by increasing psychosocial skills (adaptive cognitive and cognitive-behavioral coping strategies) used to reduce the negative psychological impact of the acute event. Implementation of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies to deal with emotional difficulties associated with a cardiac event is an active component of many multimodal psychological intervention programs, and is believed to be a factor directly related to reducing the recurrence of ACS.23,24

Our results also support the effectiveness of the intervention program in changing disease cognitions. Patients in the EG had more positive illness representations after the intervention, and had perception of greater personal control and a greater understanding of the meaning of their disease. Indeed, one of the main aspects of the intervention program was education regarding disease cognitions, providing information that could correct beliefs and help patients become more active participants in the process of illness and treatment. The positive results in terms of increased understanding of the disease are in agreement with those obtained in other studies, which report a positive effect of a brief hospital intervention at this level.16 From the standpoint of decreased cardiac vulnerability, the significant increase in understanding of the disease is also important, since there are indications of an association between good understanding of the disease and increase in therapeutic adherence.9 Increased perception of personal control also has important clinical implications, as several studies have shown that a strong sense of control in coronary patients is an important predictor of improved emotional state25 and quality of life in the context of CR after ACS.26

Research into the factors predicting a lack of adherence to CR has pointed to the importance of psychosocial aspects, such as patients’ illness cognitions and emotional state.27 De Vos et al.6 investigated patient compliance with CR and reasons for refusing or abandoning programs, finding that the main reasons for not completing CR programs were other physical problems, patients’ belief that they could handle their own problems, and the cost of rehabilitation. The literature suggests that patients’ emotional state (e.g. anxiety and depression) and illness representations need to be assessed early on as a way of optimizing adherence to and benefits of CRP, promoting better psychosocial adaptation in the post-ACS period.5,28–30. Patients’ beliefs about their illness and treatment have been found to predict clinical and psychological outcomes post-discharge.14 There is evidence that the perception that one can have some control over the course of illness, as well as belief in treatment success, are determining factors in recovery.31

This study presents evidence that a brief psychosocial intervention undertaken during hospitalization presents considerable benefits in improving psychological morbidity and adaptation to post-ACS rehabilitation. The intervention administered is of low financial cost, carries low patient and professional burden (less than three hours in total duration), and can be easily implemented in routine healthcare. This type of intervention can be particularly useful in countries such as Portugal that have fewer medical and economic resources.

The most favorable time for psychological intervention, in terms of effectiveness, is at hospitalization, when patients are most accessible to this type of intervention and to lifestyle changes. This has been confirmed by international studies and trials evaluating the efficacy of psychological intervention in post-ACS rehabilitation16,31 and also by our previous study that evaluated the effectiveness of a psychological intervention program in phase II of cardiac rehabilitation.20,32 The fact that patients are close in time to the acute coronary event, are in a supportive environment, and are physically present and have time available for participation in the intervention, creates a window of opportunity that our intervention appears to have optimized. A psychological approach during hospitalization is essential to identify and assess the representations of disease and the patient's emotional state, which significantly influence the quality of the post-ACS rehabilitation process.

The current study has some limitations. We did not assess whether the positive gains in psychosocial adjustment in the EG translated into better cardiac function and physical health than in the CG. However, it is generally accepted that psychosocial maladjustment (particularly anxiety and depression or depressive symptoms) are independent factors of worse prognosis in post-ACS patients,33–37 involving neuroendocrine and inflammatory mechanisms as well as behavioral factors.38 Furthermore, a longer follow-up would establish whether these positive effects in adjustment persist over a longer period of time. It is important to replicate this intervention study in other hospital-based coronary care units and to include longer follow-up periods and a more diverse array of outcomes, both clinical (e.g. recurrence of ACS) and behavioral (e.g. lifestyle changes).

Despite these limitation, our results highlight the positive impact of a brief psychological intervention in phase I of a CR program, targeting recognized psychological risk factors for ACS rehabilitation and ultimately for cardiac prognosis.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
1
S.O. Manda,C.P. Gale,A.S. Hall
Statistical profiling of hospital performance using acute coronary syndrome mortality
Cardiovasc J Afr, 23 (2012), pp. 546-551 http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2011-064
2
O.R. Herber,M.C. Jones,K. Smith
Assessing acute coronary syndrome patients’ cardiac-related beliefs, motivation and mood over time to predict non-attendance at cardiac rehabilitation
3
A.M. Clark,L. Hartling,B. Van der Meer
Secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
Ann Intern Med, 143 (2005), pp. 659-672
4
J. Taylor
Motivation and prevention of cardiovascular disease
Eur Heart J, 35 (2014), pp. 1356-1357
5
M.P. Tan,K. Morgan
Psychological interventions in cardiovascular disease: an update
Curr Opin Psychiatry, 28 (2015), pp. 371-377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000181
6
C. De Vos,X. Li,I. Van Vlaenderen
Participating or not in a cardiac rehabilitation programme: factors influencing a patient's decision
Eur J Prev Cardiol, 20 (2012), pp. 341-348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487312437057
7
E. Deskur-Smielecka,S. Borowicz-Bienkowska,A. Brychcy
Why patients after acute coronary syndromes do not participate in an early outpatient rehabilitation programme?
Kardiol Pol, 67 (2009), pp. 632-638
8
A. Soleimani,A. Abbasi,M. Nejatian
Factors predicting discontinuation of a hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation programme
Kardiol Pol, 67 (2009), pp. 140-146
9
G.H. Taylor,S.L. Wilson,J. Sharp
Medical, psychological, and sociodemographic factors associated with adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: a systematic review
J Cardiovasc Nurs, 26 (2011), pp. 202-209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181ef6b04
10
L. Vanhees,H.M. McGee,L.D. Dugmore
A representative study of cardiac rehabilitation activities in European Union Member States: the Carinex survey
J Cardiopulm Rehabil, 22 (2002), pp. 264-272
11
B. Bjarnason-Wehrens,H. McGee,A. Zwisker
Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 17 (2010), pp. 410-418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e328334f42d
12
R.J. Contrada,D.A. Boulifard,E.B. Hekler
Psychosocial factors in heart surgery: presurgical vulnerability and postsurgical recovery
Health Psychol, 27 (2008), pp. 309-319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.309
13
K.W. Davidson,M.M. Burg,I.M. Kronish
Association of anhedonia with recurrent major adverse cardiac events and mortality 1 year after acute coronary syndrome
Arch Gen Psychiatry, 67 (2010), pp. 480-488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.36
14
E. Broadbent,A. Leggat,A. McLachlan
Providing cardiovascular risk management information to acute coronary syndrome patients: a randomized trial
Br J Health Psychol, 18 (2013), pp. 83-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02081.x
15
T.M. McIntyre,A.C. Fernandes,V. Araújo-Soares
Programa de intervenção psicológica na reabilitação cardíaca pós-enfarte do miocárdio
Psicologia: Teor Investig Prát, 7 (2002), pp. 399-414
16
E. Broadbent,C.J. Ellis,J. Thomas
Can an illness perception intervention reduce illness anxiety in spouses of myocardial infarction patients? A randomized controlled trial
J Psychosom Res, 67 (2009), pp. 11-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.006
17
S. Kreikebaum,E. Guarneri,G. Talavera
Evaluation of a holistic cardiac rehabilitation in the reduction of biopsychosocial risk factors among patients with coronary heart disease
Psychol Health Med, 16 (2011), pp. 276-290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2010.542170
18
J. Suls,R. Martin
Heart disease occurs in a biological, psychological, and social matrix: cardiac risk factors, symptom presentation, and recovery as illustrative examples
Ann Behav Med, 41 (2011), pp. 164-173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9244-y
19
T. McIntyre,M.G. Pereira,V. Soares
Escala de Ansiedade e Depressão Hospitalar. Portuguese experimental version
Universidade do Minho, (1999)
20
T. McIntyre,M. Johnston,J. Gouveia
Resultados psicossociais na reabilitação pós-enfarte do miocárdio em mulheres Portuguesas e Escocesas
Universidade do Minho, (2004)
Contract No. FCT POCTI/ESP/35749/2000
21
R.M. Carney,K.E. Freedland,B. Steinmeyer
History of depression and survival after acute myocardial infarction
Psychosom Med, 71 (2009), pp. 253-259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31819b69e3
22
K.E. Freedland,R.M. Carney,M.W. Rich
Effect of depression on prognosis in heart failure
Heart Fail Clin, 7 (2011), pp. 11-21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2010.08.003
23
C.F. Mendes de Leon,S.M. Czajkowski,K.E. Freedland
The effect of a psychosocial intervention and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) clinical trial
J Cardiopulm Rehabil, 26 (2006), pp. 9-13
24
R. Straub
Health psychology: a biopsychosocial approach
Worth Publishers, (2007)
25
R. Gallagher,S. McKinley
Anxiety, depression and perceived control in patients having coronary artery bypass grafts
26
M.O. Lau-Walker,M.R. Cowie,M. Roughton
Coronary heart disease patients’ perception of their symptoms and sense of control are associated with their quality of life three years following hospital discharge
27
K. Orth-Gomer
Behavioral interventions for coronary heart disease patients
Biopsychosoc Med, 6 (2012), pp. 5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-6-5
28
A.M. Roest,M. Zuidersma,P. de Jonge
Myocardial infarction and generalised anxiety disorder: 10-year follow-up
Br J Psychiatry, 200 (2012), pp. 324-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.103549
29
J.F. Scherrer,T. Chrusciel,L.D. Garfield
Treatment-resistant and insufficiently treated depression and all-cause mortality following myocardial infarction
Br J Psychiatry, 200 (2012), pp. 137-142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.096479
30
T.M. McIntyre,A.C. Fernandes,V. Araújo-Soares
Intervenção Psicológica na Reabilitação pós-enfarte do miocárdio: um esforço interdisciplinar
Psicol Saúde Doenças, 1 (2000), pp. 3-10
31
K.J. Petrie,L.D. Cameron,C.J. Ellis
Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial
Psychosom Med, 64 (2002), pp. 580-586
32
A.C. Fernandes,T.M. McIntyre
Intervenção Psicológica Multimodal em pacientes na reabilitação pós-enfarte do miocárdio
Rev Bras Promoção Saúde, 19 (2006), pp. 74-83
33
N. Frasure-Smith,F. Lesperance
Depression and cardiac risk: present status and future directions
Postgrad Med J, 86 (2010), pp. 193-196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.186957
34
E.J. Martens,P. de Jonge,B. Na
Scared to death? Generalized anxiety disorder and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: the Heart and Soul Study
Arch Gen Psychiatry, 67 (2010), pp. 750-758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.74
35
W.A. Shibeshi,Y. Young-Xu,C.M. Blatt
Anxiety worsens prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease
J Am Coll Cardiol, 49 (2007), pp. 2021-2027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.007
36
A.M. Roest,E.J. Martens,J. Denollet
Prognostic association of anxiety post myocardial infarction with mortality and new cardiac events: a meta-analysis
Psychosom Med, 72 (2010), pp. 563-569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181dbff97
37
J.H. Lichtman,J.T. Bigger,J.A. Blumenthal
Depression and Coronary Heart Disease: recommendations for screening, referral and treatment: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association
Circulation, 118 (2008), pp. 1768-1775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190769
38
R. Von Kanel
Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular risk – current opinion
Swiss Med Wkly, 142 (2012), pp. w13502 http://dx.doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012.13502

( ! ) Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /var/www/html/includes_ws/librerias/html/item.php on line 1203
Call Stack
#TimeMemoryFunctionLocation
10.0003243824{main}( ).../index.php:0
20.40353681048include( '/var/www/html/portugal/plantilla/central.php' ).../index.php:45
30.40423724536include( '/var/www/html/portugal/contenidos/item.php' ).../central.php:11
40.46003882768getAutorCorrespondenciaHTML( ).../item.php:281
Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Metrics

  • Impact Factor: 1.195(2016)
  • SCImago Journal Rank (SJR):0,24
  • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):0,398