Original Article
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in heart failure and serum sodium levels
Monitorização ambulatória da pressão arterial na insuficiência cardíaca atendendo aos níveis de sódio sérico
José Carlos Arévalo-Loridoa,, , Juana Carretero-Gómeza, Luis Manzano Espinosab, Javier Sobrino-Martínezc, José Luis Arias-Jiménezd, Francesc Formigae, Antoni Castro-Salomóf, Miguel Camafort Babkowskig
a Internal Medicine Department, Zafra County Hospital, Badajoz, Spain
b Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital “Ramón y Cajal”, Madrid, Spain
c Internal Medicine Department, “l’Esperit Sant” Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
d Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital “Virgen Macarena”, Sevilla, Spain
e Internal Medicine Service, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
f Internal Medicine Service, University Hospital Sant Joan, Tarragona, Spain
g Internal Medicine Service, University Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
Received 29 July 2016, Accepted 29 November 2016

To determine whether there are differences in blood pressure profile on dynamic assessment by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) according to serum sodium levels in stable heart failure patients.


Data were collected from the Spanish National Registry on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Heart Failure (DICUMAP). Patients underwent ABPM by the oscillometric principle using a Spacelabs 90121 monitor. The sample was divided into three groups according to sodium levels and their clinical and laboratory data and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Robust statistical methods were used to compare the groups in univariate and multivariate models.


A total of 175 patients (44.57% male) were analyzed. We found a predominance of anomalous circadian blood pressure profiles in all three groups, with a significantly higher percentage of risers in the lowest serum sodium group (p=0.05). In addition, in this group there were significant differences in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure (SBP) (24-h SBP, p=0.05) and in mean daytime SBP (dSBP, p=0.008), with significant differences in nocturnal fall in SBP (p=0.05) and in diastolic blood pressure (p=0.005). In multivariate analysis a significant relationship was found between sodium levels and 24-h SBP (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, p=0.01) and dSBP (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.004).


A relationship was found between lower sodium levels and lower systolic blood pressure, especially during waking hours, with a lower decline between daytime and night-time blood pressure.


Determinar se existem diferenças no perfil da pressão arterial, através da monitorização da pressão ambulatória da pressão arterial como método de avaliação dinâmica nos doentes estáveis com insuficiência cardíaca, dependendo dos níveis de sódio sérico.


Os dados do doente foram obtidos do Registo Nacional Espanhol para Insuficiência Cardíaca e Medição Ambulatória da Pressão Arterial. Submeteram-se à monitorização ambulatória da pressão arterial através do princípio oscilométrico, utilizando um monitor Spacelabs 90121. Dividimos a amostra em três grupos de acordo com os níveis de sódio e analisámos os dados clínicos e laboratoriais, bem como os achados ecocardiográficos. Utilizámos metodologia estatística consistente para comparar os grupos em modelos univariados e multivariados.


Foram analisados 175 doentes (44,57%). Relativamente à pressão arterial, constatámos a predominância do perfil circadiano anómalo nos três grupos, com uma percentagem significativa mais elevada de um perfil de elevação no grupo com sódio sérico mais baixo (p=0,05). Além disso, constatámos neste grupo diferenças significativas nos valores médios da pressão arterial sistólica em 24 h (PAS24 h, p=0,05) e nos valores médios da pressão arterial sistólica durante período vígil (PASd, p=0,008), com uma diferença significativa na descida noturna da PAS (p=0,05) e da pressão arterial diastólica (p=0,005). Numa análise multivariada ajustada, constatámos uma relação significativa entre os níveis de sódio e a PAS24 h (OR 0,97, IC 95% 0,95-0,99, p=0,01) e a PASd (OR 0,96, IC 95% 0,94-0,99, p=0,004).


Constatámos uma relação entre os níveis mais baixos de sódio e a PAS mais baixa, especialmente durante o período vígil, com uma descida decrescente entre a pressão arterial diurna e noturna.

Heart failure, Sodium, Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Insuficiência cardíaca, Sódio, Monitorização ambulatória da pressão arterial

Hyponatremia is a common complication in heart failure (HF), especially when the disease is advanced. Studies in various patient populations, ranging from acutely decompensated hospitalized patients to stable outpatients, have shown an association between low serum sodium concentrations and poor prognosis.1–3 Equally, risk models developed in HF cohorts of outpatients4 and hospitalized patients5,6 have suggested that hyponatremia is one of the most powerful predictors of mortality. Blood pressure (BP) is another predictor of survival,7 and lower sodium concentrations are often associated with low BP. However, this association has not been thoroughly studied and is poorly understood, due in part to the lack of studies that provide dynamic 24-hour BP measurement.

The influence of hyponatremia on BP in HF patients may be the result of changes in both plasma sodium levels and extracellular volume (ECV), but may also be secondary to antihypertensive drugs used to treat HF. It may therefore be useful to know whether BP remains low at night or whether these patients’ circadian profile is disrupted.

Our aim in this study was to determine whether there are differences in BP behavior on dynamic assessment by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in stable HF patients with different serum sodium levels.


Data were collected from the Spanish National Registry on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Heart Failure (DICUMAP) of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. This was a multicenter prospective cohort study that ran from 2009 to 2013 and included data from 17 Spanish hospitals. The study complied with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, the study protocol was approved by an ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to inclusion in the registry. Inclusion criteria were age >40 years, with stable HF diagnosed according to the Framingham criteria,8 and with hypertensive, ischemic, or idiopathic cardiomyopathy as the primary cause of HF. Exclusion criteria were HF due to valvulopathy, acute HF decompensation (more than 15 days from discharge) and contraindications to ABPM (uncontrolled atrial fibrillation or other tachyarrhythmia, night work and arm circumference greater than 42 cm).

Data were collected through a website (https://www.registrodicumap.org/) which housed the database, accessed with a personal password. Confidentiality was preserved since no personal data were stored except date of birth and initials to avoid data duplication.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Patients underwent ABPM by the oscillometric principle using a Spacelabs 90121 monitor (Spacelabs Inc., WA, USA). Data analysis was performed using Spacelabs 90121 report management software installed on a personal computer. Data were sent to www.registrodicumap.org in ASCII format. The monitor's cuff was placed on the patient's non-dominant arm in the morning and removed at the same time the following morning. The patients were given a diary to record any unexpected events and times of going to sleep and waking, and were instructed to relax the cuffed arm when inflation began. Minimum criteria to validate the recording were more than 60 successful readings out of a total of 95 scheduled, with at least two effective readings per hour.

Data collected from the patients, adjusted to waking and sleeping periods according to patient diaries, included mean 24-h systolic BP (24-h SBP), mean 24-h diastolic BP (24-h DBP), mean daytime systolic BP (dSBP), mean daytime diastolic BP (dDBP), mean night-time systolic BP (nSBP) and mean night-time diastolic BP (nDBP). The differences between dSBP and nSBP (dip-SBP) and between dDBP and nDBP (dip-DBP) were also calculated and the patients were classified according to their circadian BP profile as dipper when BP declined more than 10% from the daytime level, non-dipper when BP declined less than 10% from the daytime level, riser when night-time BP was higher than daytime BP, and extreme dipper when BP declined more than 20% from the daytime level, and also as reducers (dipper and extreme dipper) or non-reducers (non-dipper and riser).

Study variables

The DICUMAP registry included sociodemographic information, comorbidities, clinical data (BP, heart rate and body mass index [BMI]), and laboratory data including hemoglobin, standard biochemical parameters and natriuretic peptides when available. HF severity was classified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on two-dimensional echocardiography.

Statistical analysis

To analyze the influence of serum sodium on BP, the study population was divided into quartiles by sodium level and three groups were created by combining the second and third quartiles, to obtain clearly differentiated groups: Group 1, Na 133-139 mEq/l (n=48); Group 2, Na 140-142 mEq/l (n=81); and Group 3, Na 143-147 mEq/l (n=46). A flowchart of the patient selection process is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flowchart of the patient selection process. ABPM: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Robust statistical methods were used which are not unduly affected by outliers or small departures from model assumptions. Qualitative and categorical data were expressed as absolute number and percentage and were compared in univariate analysis by the chi-square test. Quantitative data were expressed as 20% trimmed mean and median absolute deviation (MAD) and were compared in univariate analysis by ANOVA in cases of normality and homoscedasticity with the approximate Welch's t test in cases of unequal variances in the samples, and the Rust-Fligner test in the remainder. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cantoni and Ronchetti's approach9 based on robust quasi-deviance functions for estimation and variable selection. The final model, based on whether patients belonged to Group 1, was adjusted for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, BMI, heart rate, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and LVEF.

The software package used for the statistical analysis was R version 3.2.1 (2015-06-18).


A total of 186 patients (44.57% male, mean age 76.88±8.16 years) were included. Their baseline characteristics according to group of serum sodium levels are shown in Table 1. eGFR and blood glucose levels were slightly higher in Group 1, but not significantly (p=0.78 and p=0.26, respectively). Group 2 had a significantly higher percentage of patients with preserved ejection fraction (86.42% vs. 70.83% in Group 1 and 68.89% in Group 3, p=0.03). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was only reported in 39 patients (13 in Group 1, 18 in Group 2 and 8 in Group 3). Although a tendency for higher BP across groups was found, this was not significant (p=0.37).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients by group of serum sodium levels.

Variable  Group 1 (n=48)  Group 2 (n=81)  Group 3 (n=46) 
Male  25 (52.1%)  35 (43.21%)  18 (39.13%)  0.42 
Age (years)  79.35 (7.73)  77.10 (8.05)  76.68 (7.31)  0.38 
Hypertension  45 (83.75%)  76 (93.83%)  43 (93.48%)  0.99 
Smoking  1 (2.08%)  11 (13.58%)  5 (10.87%)  0.09 
Alcohol consumption  14 (29.17%)  21 (25.93%)  11 (23.91%)  0.84 
Type 2 diabetes  22 (45.83%)  36 (44.44%)  17 (36.96%)  0.63 
Dyslipidemia  30 (62.5%)  42 (51.85%)  21 (45.65%)  0.24 
CKD  17 (35.42%)  28 (34.57%)  14 (30.43%)  0.85 
Arrhythmia  25 (52.08%)  45 (55.56%)  21 (45.65%)  0.56 
BMI  29.35 (3.11)  29.30 (4.31)  29.38 (3.03)  0.55 
SBP (mmHg)  131.8 (19.64)  139.2 (22.23)  138 (12.60)  0.1 
DBP (mmHg)  72.48 (14.08)  74.93 (13.34)  74.71 (10.74)  0.8 
Heart rate (bpm)  72.33 (12.60)  71.83 (11.86)  73.07 (12.60)  0.91 
Hemoglobin (g/dl)  12.73 (1.77)  12.40 (2.22)  12.87 (1.33)  0.46 
Creatinine (mg/dl)  1.21 (0.57)  1.12 (0.44)  1.06 (0.37)  0.38 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)  53.89 (22.97)  55.48 (25.93)  57.88 (22.97)  0.78 
Blood glucose (mg/dl)  117.8 (26.68)  113.48 (25.2)  108.46 (20.01)  0.26 
Sodium (mEq/l)  137.8 (1.48)  140.97 (1.48)  143.53 (1.48)  0.0000 
Potassium (mEq/l)  4.58 (0.57)  4.44 (0.44)  4.45 (0.44)  0.39 
BNPa  416.96 (536.2)  447.97 (497.4)  486.52 (411.57)  0.37 
LVEF  56.23 (14.82)  60.73 (7.41)  55.25 (44.08)  0.0078 
Left atrial diameter (n=168)  39.5 (19.1)  39.26 (14.47)  39.90 (11.84)  0.79 
HFpEF  34 (70.83%)  70 (86.42%)  31 (68.89%)  0.03 
NYHA class
2 (4.2%)  12 (14.81%)  6 (13.04%)  0.25 
II  35 (72.92%)  51 (62.96%)  34 (73.91%)  0.25 
III  11 (22.92%)  18 (22.22%)  6 (13.04%)  0.25 
Hypertensive  30 (62.5%)  62 (76.64%)  35 (76.09%)  0.2 
Ischemic  7 (14.5%)  5 (6.17%)  6 (13.04%)  0.2 
Both  11 (22.92%)  13 (16.05%)  4 (8.70%)  0.2 
Idiopathic  0 (0%)  1 (1.23%)  1 (2.17%)  0.2 
Loop diuretics  34 (70.8%)  55 (67.9%)  39 (84.78%)  0.1 
Beta-blockers  34 (70.8%)  41 (50.62%)  28 (60.87%)  0.07 
Thiazides  8 (16.67%)  12 (14.81%)  3 (6.52%)  0.2 
Calcium antagonists  12 (25%)  25 (30.86%)  16 (34.78%)  0.5 
ACEIs/ARBs  38 (79.2%)  59 (72.8%)  38 (82.6%)  0.41 
Aldosterone antagonists  3 (6.25%)  4 (4.94%)  3 (6.52%)  0.9 

ACEIs/ARBS: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers; BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HFpEF: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (>45%); LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA: New York Heart Association; SBP: systolic blood pressure.


BNP reported in 39 patients.

Regarding treatment (Table 1), no differences were found in antihypertensive drugs or diuretics, including thiazides. The proportion of patients in Group 1 taking beta-blockers was slightly higher (70.8% vs. 50.62% in Group 2 and 60.87% in Group 3, p=0.07), although not significantly. Dosages in the total sample were (median and interquartile range): 40 mg (0) for diuretics, 5 mg (7.5) for betablockers, 75 mg (128) for angiotensin receptor blockers, 10 mg (15) for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 10 mg (15) for calcium antagonists, 25 mg (0) for aldosterone antagonists and 12.5 mg (12.5) for thiazides.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Data from 24-h ABPM (Table 2) showed firstly a predominance of anomalous circadian profiles (absence of normal night-time BP fall) in all three groups. In total we found 37.14% non-dippers, 38.29% risers and 4% extreme dippers, without significant differences between the groups. However, Group 1 had a significantly higher percentage with a riser pattern than the other two groups (p=0.05). Secondly, 24-h SBP and dSBP were significantly higher in Groups 2 and 3 (24-h SBP: 118.82±18.8 mmHg in Group 1, 126.39±16.8 mmHg in Group 2 and 123.8±20.1 mmHg in Group 3, p=0.05, and dSBP: 119.37±20.7 mmHg in Group 1, 128.06±16.68 mmHg in Group 2 and 127.18±19.72 mmHg in Group 3, p=0.008). Consequently, significant differences were also found in falls in both SBP and DBP between waking and sleeping times, the smallest fall being seen in Group 1 (Table 2 and Figure 2).

Table 2.

Findings by group, derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Variable  Group 1 (n=48)  Group 2 (n=81)  Group 3 (n=46) 
24-h SBP (mmHg)  118.82 (18.88)  126.39 (16.82)  123.8 (20.1)  0.05 
24-h DBP (mmHg)  64.42 (9.95)  66.14 (10.32)  64.52 (13.4)  0.6 
dSBP (mmHg)  119.57 (20.76)  128.06 (16.68)  127.18 (19.72)  0.008 
dDBP (mmHg)  65.17 (12.12)  68.75 (9.97)  67.59 (10.41)  0.29 
nSBP (mmHg)  117.29 (23.40)  123.43 (18.11)  120.22 (19.19)  0.3 
nDBP (mmHg)  64.28 (11.56)  62.89 (10.46)  60.92 (11.02)  0.37 
SBP (mmHg)  0.21 (9.74)  4.4 (8.89)  5.1 (7.41)  0.5 
dip-DBP (mmHg)  2.14 (9.63)  8.63 (10.37)  10.24 (10.15)  0.16 
Circadian profile
Dipper  7 (14.6%)  18 (22.22%)  11 (23.91%)  0.1 
Non-dipper  13 (27.08%)  32 (39.51%)  20 (43.48%)  0.1 
Riser  27 (56.25%)  26 (32.1%)  14 (30.43%)  0.1 
Extreme dipper  1 (2.08%)  5 (6.17%)  1 (2.17%)  0.1 
Reducer  8 (16.67%)  23 (28.4%)  12 (26.09%)  0.3 

24-h DBP: mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure; 24-h SBP: mean 24-h systolic blood pressure; dDBP: mean daytime diastolic blood pressure; dip-DBP: mean difference between dDBP and nDBP; dip-SBP: mean difference between dSBP and nSBP; dSBP: mean daytime systolic blood pressure; nDBP: mean night-time diastolic blood pressure; nSBP: mean night-time systolic blood pressure.

Figure 2.

Boxplots showing differences in 24-h SBP (mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure), dSBP (mean daytime systolic blood pressure), fall in SBP (systolic blood pressure) and fall in DBP (diastolic blood pressure), by groups of serum sodium level.

In multivariate adjusted regression analysis (Table 3), a significant relationship was found between sodium levels and both 24-h SBP (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.99, p=0.01) and dSBP (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.004), but no significant differences in the other variables.

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring variables.

Variable  Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
  OR  95% CI  OR  95% CI 
24-h SBP  0.97  0.95-0.99  0.07  0.97  0.95-0.99  0.01 
24-h DBP  0.98  0.95-1.02  0.93  0.99  0.95-1.03  0.62 
dSBP  0.96  0.94-0.98  0.001  0.96  0.94-0.99  0.004 
dDBP  0.97  0.94-1.01  0.15  0.98  0.94-1.02  0.31 
nSBP  0.98  0.96-1.004  0.14  0.98  0.96-1.00  0.064 
nDBP  1.01  0.98-1.05  0.25  1.02  0.98-1.05  0.29 
dip-SBP  0.98  0.96-1.01  0.22  0.99  0.96-1.02  0.65 
dip-DBP  0.97  0.94-0.99  0.03  0.97  0.95-1.00  0.11 
Reducer profile  0.5  0.22-1.23  0.13  0.52  0.22-1.25  0.14 

24-h DBP: mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure; 24-h SBP: mean 24-h systolic blood pressure; CI: confidence interval; dDBP: mean daytime diastolic blood pressure; dip-DBP: mean difference between dDBP and nDBP; dip-SBP: mean difference between dSBP and nSBP; dSBP: mean daytime systolic blood pressure; nDBP: mean night-time diastolic blood pressure; nSBP: mean night-time systolic blood pressure; OR: odds ratio.


The main finding in our study is that lower serum sodium levels in outpatients with HF are related to lower SBP, principally during waking hours.

Hyponatremia often coexists with advanced HF,10 and data from registries and clinical trials have shown an association between hyponatremia and increased mortality and morbidity even in outpatients.11 In most of these cases, low BP was linked with low serum sodium, but before the present study, data from a complete 24-h period of BP monitoring had not been published, and previous data were probably based on a single reading per patient, likely to have been taken in the daytime.

In the general population sodium balance is almost entirely controlled by the kidneys through urinary sodium excretion, and the immediate effects of dietary sodium intake are to modify blood sodium and consequently ECV. These changes largely account for later alterations that influence BP, but it is also known that acute rises in sodium intake can trigger a rise in BP by either increasing blood sodium levels even when ECV falls,12 or by increasing ECV when plasma sodium levels decrease.13 This would indicate that acute changes in blood sodium and ECV are both likely able to influence BP independently, which in cases of hyponatremia would lead to lower BP. Although in HF this situation could persist, the reasons are different, particularly in the case of hyponatremia due to upregulation of maladaptive neurohormonal mechanisms, including increased secretion of arginine vasopressin and increased activity of the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems, which may underlie the link between development of hyponatremia and HF severity.14 Thus, in HF patients, neurohormonal control may not affect BP as much as in other populations, and reduced cardiac output leading to low SBP may play a more important role; thus, in our study only the differences in SBP were significant, DBP being similar across groups, even though no relationship was found between serum sodium concentrations and LVEF either in our analysis or in most published studies.15–18 In addition, drugs used to treat HF can also influence both BP and hyponatremia. In our study no differences were found between groups regarding the use of these drugs, but it should be noted that in all groups the normal circadian BP profile was absent, with a lower night-time fall in BP, as described previously.19

This lower BP fall while sleeping can be explained by several factors. Firstly, most drugs that affect BP are taken early in the morning, their effects persisting during waking hours but then weakening during the night. Secondly, it could result from a nocturnal increase in central venous pressure as a consequence of dispersion of retained fluids when body position changes during sleep. Thirdly, in healthy individuals the cardiopulmonary baroreflex inhibits sympathetic activation and helps decrease BP, but some studies suggest that impaired baroreflex in HF may cause a reduction in night-time BP decline,20,21 a finding that may also be related to the increased sympathetic stimulation observed in HF, especially in patients with hyponatremia.22 The latter hypothesis could explain the lower nocturnal BP dip in our Group 1, as well as the higher proportion of riser profiles in this group. Reduction in the circadian amplitude of BP rhythm has been related to severity of HF,23 similarly to hyponatremia, and could partly explain the worse outcomes in these patients. It also suggests avenues for further research, focusing on changes in scheduling of medication, administering antihypertensive drugs at the beginning of sleep instead of on waking, aiming to increase night-time BP fall.

Study limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, its results are based on cross-sectional analysis, and so causal relationships cannot be determined. Secondly, because of the small sample size, it was divided by quartiles of sodium levels, instead of comparing a true hyponatremic group (defined as sodium level <135 mEq/l) with other patients; however, some studies have shown worse outcomes when sodium levels drop below 140 mEq/l.1 In addition, the number of patients per group was low, which probably diminished the significance of the results, and so we used robust statistical methods to improve them. On the other hand, the pathogenesis of hyponatremia in HF is multifactorial. Data on osmolarity were not available in all our patients, and thus it is not known whether patients’ hyponatremia was hyper- or hypovolemic. In this regard, diuretic doses were not available by group, but the rate of thiazide use was low, and it therefore seems unlikely that diuretic overuse was the cause of hyponatremia in a significant proportion of cases. Finally, the doses of drugs taken by participants were not assessed, and the lack of this information – which could have influenced BP values – could have biased our results.

On the other hand, our study included the largest number to date of HF patients to undergo ABPM.


Our findings show a relationship between lower sodium levels in patients with HF and low SBP, principally during waking hours, and with a smaller fall in BP between daytime and night-time, which could be partly responsible for the worse outcome in these patients. Further studies will be needed to elucidate this subject.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


We thank all the investigators of the DICUMAP registry. We are grateful to the DICUMAP Registry Contract Research Organization S&H Medical Science Service for its work in quality control, data management and administrative support.


Investigators of the DICUMAP registry: Miguel Camafort Babkowski; José Carlos Arévalo Lorido; Luis Manzano Espinosa; Javier Sobrino Martínez; José Luis Arias Jiménez; Jorge Francisco Gómez Cerezo; Jesús Díez Manglano; Oscar Aramburu Bodas; Jordi Grau Amorós; Joan Carles Trullás Vila; Manuel Montero Pérez-Barquero; Gerard Torres Cortada; José Manuel Varela Aguilar; Gonzalo Martínez De las Cuevas; Manuel Méndez Bailón; Nuria Ribas Pizá; Fernando Salgado Ordóñez; Francesc Formiga; Antoni Castro Salomó.

M. Gheorghiade,W.T. Abraham,N.M. Albert
Relationship between admission serum concentration and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure: an analysis from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry
Eur Heart J, 28 (2007), pp. 980-988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl542
Ch. Bavishi,S. Ather,A. Bambhroliya
Prognostic significance of hyponatremia among ambulatory patients with heart failure and preserved and reduced ejection fractions
Am J Cardiol, 113 (2014), pp. 1834-1838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.017
D. Rusinaru,C. Tribouilloy,C. Berry
Relationship of serum sodium concentration to mortality in a wide spectrum of heart failure patients with preserved and with reduced ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysis
Eur J Heart Fail, 14 (2012), pp. 1139-1146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs099
R. Vazquez,A. Bayés-Genís,I. Cygankiewicz,on behalf of the MUSIC Investigators
The MUSIC risk score: a simple method for predicting mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure
Eur Heart J, 30 (2009), pp. 1088-1096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp032
G.M. Felker,J.D. Leimberger,R.M. Califf
Risk stratification after hospitalization for decompensated heart failure
J Card Fail, 10 (2004), pp. 460-466
W.C. Levy,D. Mozaffarian,D.T. Linker
The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure
Circulation, 113 (2006), pp. 1424-1433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584102
J.I. Pérez-Calvo,M. Montero-Pérez-Barquero,M. Camafort-Babkowski,RICA Investigators
Influence of admission blood pressure on mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure
S.A. Hunt,W.T. Abraham,M.H. Chin
ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society
E. Cantoni,E. Ronchetti
Robust inference for generalized linear models
J Am Stat Assoc, 96 (2001), pp. 1022-1030
S.R. Goldsmith
Hyponatremia and outcomes in patients with heart failure
L. Balling,M. Schou,L. Videbaek
Prevalence and prognostic significance of hyponatremia in outpatients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, 13 (2011), pp. 968-973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfr086
S.M. Friedman
The relation of cell volume, cell sodium and the transmembrane sodium gradient to blood pressure
J Hypertens, 8 (1990), pp. 67-73
R.D. Manning,A.C. Guyton,T.G. Coleman
Hypertension in dogs during antidiuretic hormone and hypotonic saline infusion
Am J Physiol, 236 (1979), pp. H314-H322
M. Packer,W.H. Lee,P.D. Kessler
Role of neurohormonal mechanisms in determining survival in patients with severe chronic heart failure
Circulation, 75 (1987), pp. IV80-IV92
N. Sato,M. Gheorghiade,K. Kajimoto
Hyponatremia and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted for heart failure (from the ATTEND registry)
Am J Cardiol, 111 (2013), pp. 1019-1025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.019
J.C. Arévalo-Lorido,J. Carretero-Gómez,F. Formiga,RICA Investigators
Hyponatremia as predictor of worse outcome in real world patients admitted with acute heart failure
Cardiol J, 20 (2013), pp. 506-512 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2013.0136
M. Gheorghiade,J.S. Rossi,W. Cotts
Characterization and prognostic value of persistent hyponatremia in patients with severe heart failure in the ESCAPE trial
Arch Intern Med, 167 (2007), pp. 1998-2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.18.1998
L. Klein,C.M. O’Connor,J.D. Leimberger
Lower serum sodium is associated with increased short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with worsening heart failure: results from the Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure (OPTIME-CHF Study)
F. Portaluppi,L. Martanari,M. Ferlini
Consistent changes in the circadian rhythms of blood pressure and atrial natriuretic peptide in congestive heart failure
Chronobiol Int, 8 (1991), pp. 432-439
T.B. Levine,G.S. Francis,S.R. Goldsmith
Activity of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system assessed by plasma hormone levels and their relationship to hemodynamic abnormalities in congestive heart failure
Am J Cardiol, 49 (1982), pp. 1659-1666
I.H. Zucker,A.M. Earle,G.P. Gilmore
The mechanism of adaptation of left atrial stretch receptors in dogs with chronic congestive heart failure
J Clin Investig, 60 (1997), pp. 232-331
T.D. Filippatos,M.S. Elisaf
Hyponatremia in patients with heart failure
World J Cardiol, 5 (2013), pp. 317-328 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v5.i9.317
P. Van de Borne,M. Abramowicz,S. Degre
Effects of chronic congestive heart failure on 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate patterns: a hemodynamic approach
Am Heart J, 123 (1992), pp. 998-1004

( ! ) Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /var/www/html/includes_ws/librerias/html/item.php on line 1196
Call Stack
10.0005243680{main}( ).../index.php:0
20.47943494104include( '/var/www/html/portugal/plantilla/central.php' ).../index.php:45
30.48013537592include( '/var/www/html/portugal/contenidos/item.php' ).../central.php:11
40.54393629320getAutorCorrespondenciaHTML( ).../item.php:281
Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia


  • Impact Factor: 1.195(2016)
  • SCImago Journal Rank (SJR):0,24
  • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):0,398