( ! ) Notice: Undefined index: paginaFinal in /var/www/html/portugal/modulos/meta-tags-esc.php on line 61 Call Stack #TimeMemoryFunctionLocation 10.0002243712{main}( ).../index.php:0 20.42603212016include( '/var/www/html/portugal/plantilla/cabecera.php' ).../index.php:44 30.42643231528include( '/var/www/html/portugal/modulos/meta-tags-esc.php' ).../cabecera.php:5 " name="citation_lastpage" /> Factors influencing the outcome of endovascular embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms
PS135
Factors influencing the outcome of endovascular embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms
I. Kucybala, , K. Krupa, J. Polak, J. Wnuk
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of morphologic parameters of anterior communicating artery aneurysms and the method of embolization on the success rate of procedure.

Introduction: Endovascular embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms is currently considered as primary management tool and the improvement of procedural success rate is crucial.

Methods: Treatment process of 109 patients undergoing endovascular embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysm was retrospectively analysed. All procedures were performed between August 2006 and December 2016 in Department of Interventional Radiology of University Hospital in Cracow (Poland). The mean age of patients was 56.7±15.2 years (range 28–91), 50.5% of patients were female. Used methods of embolization: coiling alone, balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, Y-stenting+coiling. Evaluated morphologic parameters: width of the neck, maximal height, maximal width, shape of aneurysm, dome orientation. The outcome of the procedure was assessed with Raymond–Roy occlusion classification. Data were analysed using chi-square test and Student's t-test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: Coiling alone significantly improved outcome of embolization considered as better score in Raymond–Roy occlusion classification, compared to other methods (1.4±0.5 vs. 1.6±0.7; p=0.034). In case of irregular aneurysms (85.7% vs. 34.6% (regular aneurysms); p=0.025; OR=2.615) and those with posterior orientation of the dome (76.9% vs. 36.5% (anterior orientation); p=0.005; OR=5.810) incomplete embolization (Raymond–Roy class II and III) was significantly more frequent. Within the group of discharged patients, only 33.3% undergone control radiologic examination – 40.7% conventional angiography, 59.3% MR angiography. In that group, 81.5% of aneurysms had better or the same class in Raymond–Roy classification and 18.5% had worse outcome. We did not discovered any statistically significant factor contributing to that phenomenon.

Conclusion: Coiling alone is the most efficient method in terms of the aneurysm occlusion rate. Irregular shape of the aneurysm and posterior orientation of the dome significantly hinder the embolization of aneurysm.


( ! ) Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /var/www/html/includes_ws/librerias/html/item.php on line 1203
Call Stack
#TimeMemoryFunctionLocation
10.0002243712{main}( ).../index.php:0
20.42713206352include( '/var/www/html/portugal/plantilla/central.php' ).../index.php:45
30.42803249840include( '/var/www/html/portugal/contenidos/item.php' ).../central.php:11
40.48973253656getAutorCorrespondenciaHTML( ).../item.php:281

Open Access

Creative Commons License
Porto Biomedical Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

+ info