( ! ) Notice: Undefined index: paginaFinal in /var/www/html/portugal/modulos/meta-tags-esc.php on line 61 Call Stack #TimeMemoryFunctionLocation 10.0002243536{main}( ).../index.php:0 20.39063304496include( '/var/www/html/portugal/plantilla/cabecera.php' ).../index.php:44 30.39103324008include( '/var/www/html/portugal/modulos/meta-tags-esc.php' ).../cabecera.php:5 " name="citation_lastpage" /> Differences in aerobic capacity and spirometric parameters between athletes and nonathletes
Differences in aerobic capacity and spirometric parameters between athletes and nonathletes
V. Kostić
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia

Aim: To investigate if there are differences in aerobic capacity and spirometric parameters between athletes and nonathletes, and also differences in these parameters between anaerobic and aerobic athletes.

Introduction: Physical fitness is defined as ability of organism to increase level of metabolic processes due to increased level of metabolic needs. Aerobic capacity is measured by maximum level of oxygen consumption (VO2max), and it can be expressed by absolute (l/min) or relative (ml/kg/min) value. Pulmonary capacity has great evaluation importance for sport and health of general population.

Methods: Number of participants was 45 males, aged 18–35 years, divided into 2 groups: athletes and nonathletes. Athletes were divided by sport type in aerobic and anaerobic group of athletes. Testing was consisted of anthropometric measuring, spirometry and measuring of aerobic capacity on ergobycicle with mask, by principle of ramp test.

Results: Value of VO2max in group of athletes (55.46ml/kg/min, p<0.05) was significantly greater than in group of nonathletes (37.78ml/kg/min, p<0.05). Compared between all groups, VO2max showed significant difference in both aerobic (58.88ml/kg/min, p<0.05) and anaerobic (52.04ml/kg/min, p<0.05) athletes in relation to nonathletes (38.78ml/kg/min, p<0.05). Spirometric parameters (FVC, FEV1) were significantly greater in group of nonathletes (5.481L, 4.951L, p<0.05) than in group of athletes (4.874L, 4.635L, p<0.05). Compared between all groups, we found significant difference in FVC between group of nonathletes (5.481L, p<0.05) and anaerobic athletes (4.807L, p<0.05), and in Tiffeneau index between group of anaerobic athletes (97.29%, p<0.05) and nonathletes (90.82%, p<0.05).

Conclusion: Values of anthropometric parameters are greater in group of nonathletes. Differences in body weight and body mass caused greater values of FVC and FEV1 in group of nonathletes. Values of aerobic capacity are increasing with training. The greatest values of aerobic capacity are shown by aerobic athletes.

Acknowledgements: To Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad for using their resources; To Athletic Club “Vojvodina”, Novi Sad and Triathlon Club “Tryogy” for participating; To Assist. Proff. Aleksandar Klašnja for mentorship.1–15

R.W. Bowers,E.L. Fox,M.L. Foss
The physiological basis of physical education and athletics, 3rd ed.,
G. Whyte,N. Spurway,D. MacLaren
The physiology of training,
G. Ranković,V. Mutavdžić,D. Toskić,A. Preljević,M. Kocić,G. Nedin-Ranković
Aerobic capacity as an indicator in different kinds of sports
Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 10 (2010), pp. 44-48
Y.S. Shin,S.M. Yang,M.Y. Kim,L.K. Lee,L.W.D. Byoung-Sun Park,J.W. Noh
Analysis of the respirogram phase of Korean wrestling athletes compared with nonathletes for sports physiotherapy research
Phys Ther Sci, 28 (2016), pp. 392-398
N. Ponorac,A. Matavulj,N. Grujić,Z. Rajkovača,P. Kovačević
Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) as the indicator of physicalworking capacity in sportsmen
Acta Med Med, 44 (2005), pp. 17-20
V. Pelemiš,N. Mitrović,B. Cicović,D. Lolić
Maximal oxigen consumption for different groups of athletes
Sportske nauke i zdravlje, 1 (2011), pp. 52-57
K. Albouaini,M. Egred,A. Alahmar,D.J. Wright
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its application
Postgrad Med J, 83 (2010), pp. 675-682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.121558
F. de Jong
Lung function testing feature: spirometers
Breathe, 4 (2008), pp. 251-254
P. Myrianthefs,I. Grammatopoulou,T. Katsoulas,G. Baltopoulos
Spirometry may underestimate airway obstruction in professional Greek athletes
Clin Respir J, 8 (2014), pp. 240-247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.12066
J.H. Wilmore,D.L. Costil
Physiology of sport and exercise
2nd ed., Human Cinetics, (1999)
F. Verstappen,R. Huppertz,L. Snoeckx
Effect of training specificity on maximal treadmill and bicycle ergometer exercise
Int J Sport Med, 3 (1982), pp. 43-46
V. Klisuras
Fundamentals of sports physiology belgrade
Institut Za Sport, (2013)
A. Kausar,S. Mudassir,K.M. Badaam,A. Shete,S. Khan
Cardiorespiratory fitness of university volleyball players and sedentary youngpeople in marathwada region of Maharashtra Province in India
J Clin Diagn Res, 9 (2015), pp. 20-21
A.H. Herdy,A. Caixeta
Brazilian cardiorespiratory fitness classification based on maximum oxygen consumption
Arq Bras Cardiol, 106 (2016), pp. 389-395 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160070
E. Franchini,F.B.D. Vecchio,K.A. Matsushigue,G.G. Artioli
Physiological profiles of Elite Judo athletes

Open Access

Creative Commons License
Porto Biomedical Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

+ info